Post by account_disabled on Nov 5, 2023 22:14:20 GMT -5
The Labor Code, the employee is subject to periodic medical examinations, and in the event of incapacity for work lasting longer than days due to illness, the employee is also subject to medical examinations to determine the ability to perform work in the current position; In turn, according to art. § of the Labor Code, an employer cannot allow an employee to work without a valid medical certificate confirming the lack of contraindications to work in a specific position. The employer's obligation to refer for medical check-ups after the sickness benefit period has expired applies to an employee who, after this period.
Reported to work and declared his readiness to work. From the content of art. § of the Code of Civil Procedure states that "the employee philippines photo editor is subject to" medical examinations, including check-ups. The authoritative properties of the provision remain beyond discussion. This phrase should be read as an obligation to undergo testing, which is reflected in the prohibition expressed in § of the article in question. Since the employer cannot allow an employee to work without current tests, the discussed obligation must be related to the basic obligation, which is to perform work under Art. § of the Labor Code.
An employee who, without justification which was the case in the facts of the case does not submit to control examinations, makes it impossible to perform work, which is clearly classified as a breach of a fundamental obligation. New wording of the regulations on medical prevention In the provisions of Art. there are new provisions, i.e.: § : The tests referred to in § , and are carried out at the employer's expense, subject to § . The employer also bears other costs of preventive health care for employees, necessary due to working conditions.
Reported to work and declared his readiness to work. From the content of art. § of the Code of Civil Procedure states that "the employee philippines photo editor is subject to" medical examinations, including check-ups. The authoritative properties of the provision remain beyond discussion. This phrase should be read as an obligation to undergo testing, which is reflected in the prohibition expressed in § of the article in question. Since the employer cannot allow an employee to work without current tests, the discussed obligation must be related to the basic obligation, which is to perform work under Art. § of the Labor Code.
An employee who, without justification which was the case in the facts of the case does not submit to control examinations, makes it impossible to perform work, which is clearly classified as a breach of a fundamental obligation. New wording of the regulations on medical prevention In the provisions of Art. there are new provisions, i.e.: § : The tests referred to in § , and are carried out at the employer's expense, subject to § . The employer also bears other costs of preventive health care for employees, necessary due to working conditions.