Post by saiful200 on Aug 20, 2024 4:01:29 GMT -5
If we talk about scientific advances and, in particular, in the area of health, I believe that the trend is always to favor the study of the most relevant diseases worldwide; In fact, a clear example is research against cancer vs research against Chagas (a disease caused by a very common parasite in precarious and low-resource areas in Latin America). Researching the statistics of each of these diseases, I have found that in , it is estimated that new cases of cancer will be diagnosed ONLY in the United States and people will die from the disease (Source: ), while it is estimated that in the world there are between and millions of people infected by Trypanosoma cruzi, the parasite that causes Chagas disease, most of them in Latin America (Source: ).
I understand that commercial logic prevails here, without a doubt. Since its https://www.latestdatabase.com/ conception, the idea of a company as such was to make profits. The new model of social enterprise seems like a magnificent idea to me, but today it continues to be for many companies (not all, of course) a poetic, pompous and grandiloquent manifestation along with empty oratory without deep intentions for change. Access to respond Mauricio «Throughout the search, they have contacted me for very few interviews, but in one of them they mentioned to me that they were not interested in hiring women with children for the position, given that, being of a managerial nature, the possible Absenteeism from work, for example, when a child gets sick, was not contemplated.
Here are two issues to highlight: ) it is assumed that it is the woman who takes care of her children when they get sick, ) a woman with children is not suitable for certain positions with such responsibility on her back. "I agree with what you say, but I would also like to clarify something... the parents of these children, what happens... they renounce their duties and rights as such, because if you have a man in charge, then, if their son gets sick... he is not able to take care of them. ? Do they unilaterally assume that the Father has no right to care about his children? Or is it that the Popes are not suitable to take care of them... I believe that the problem is not about being a man or a woman; A Doctor, Father of children and happily married tells you; It's about the fact that they only want an exclusivity that they are not willing to give up... "the Family" hinders them a little... I'm sure that if you didn't have children, you would go to the interview... but what happens, if they accept you, suppose you don't have children …would you also have to give up having them one day!!…? Why come on, you don't need preparation and Curriculum and you are sure to take care of your children, which shows the great abilities that women have to manage and organize their time better than us men.
I understand that commercial logic prevails here, without a doubt. Since its https://www.latestdatabase.com/ conception, the idea of a company as such was to make profits. The new model of social enterprise seems like a magnificent idea to me, but today it continues to be for many companies (not all, of course) a poetic, pompous and grandiloquent manifestation along with empty oratory without deep intentions for change. Access to respond Mauricio «Throughout the search, they have contacted me for very few interviews, but in one of them they mentioned to me that they were not interested in hiring women with children for the position, given that, being of a managerial nature, the possible Absenteeism from work, for example, when a child gets sick, was not contemplated.
Here are two issues to highlight: ) it is assumed that it is the woman who takes care of her children when they get sick, ) a woman with children is not suitable for certain positions with such responsibility on her back. "I agree with what you say, but I would also like to clarify something... the parents of these children, what happens... they renounce their duties and rights as such, because if you have a man in charge, then, if their son gets sick... he is not able to take care of them. ? Do they unilaterally assume that the Father has no right to care about his children? Or is it that the Popes are not suitable to take care of them... I believe that the problem is not about being a man or a woman; A Doctor, Father of children and happily married tells you; It's about the fact that they only want an exclusivity that they are not willing to give up... "the Family" hinders them a little... I'm sure that if you didn't have children, you would go to the interview... but what happens, if they accept you, suppose you don't have children …would you also have to give up having them one day!!…? Why come on, you don't need preparation and Curriculum and you are sure to take care of your children, which shows the great abilities that women have to manage and organize their time better than us men.